Pittsburgh Post-Gazette: Editorial: Expediting the Charles Anderson Bridge project: An infrastructure win for the Gainey administration

The fate of the Charles Anderson Bridge in Oakland was shaping up to be another embarrassment for the struggling Gainey administration — but Mr. Gainey’s apparent deal with state and federal agencies to accelerate a full rehabilitation of the span, if it is seen through, may turn out to be a welcome example of effective leadership from Grant Street. The bridge carries the Boulevard of the Allies over Panther Hollow.

PennDOT rebuilt the Fern Hollow Bridge in under a year due to the city’s emergency declaration, which allowed design and construction to proceed in parallel. Because the Charles Anderson has been on the decrepit list for so long, much of the preparatory work is already complete. By moving funding up the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission’s priority list, at least a year may be cut off the construction schedule. This means the city is canceling its remedial repairs and will keep the bridge closed for the duration of the full rehab.



In the morbid discussion of city-owned bridges with inspection results similar to, or even worse than, the collapsed Fern Hollow Bridge, the Charles Anderson Bridge was always near the top of the list. Pittsburghers’ fears were confirmed when the city closed the bridge on an emergency basis on Feb. 1.

Mr. Gainey attempted to dodge responsibility for a postponement of rehab funding for the span. Mayor Bill Peduto’s 2022 capital budget projected $3 million in spending on the Charles Anderson in 2023, but Mr. Gainey’s 2023 capital budget pushed that projection back an entire year. The mayor attributed this to a postponement by the SPC transportation planning agency — but he sits on the executive committee of the commission. A Post-Gazette investigation later revealed that Mr. Gainey has an extremely poor attendance record at SPC meetings.

Mr. Gainey pleaded that Mr. Peduto’s $3 million plans for the bridge were merely a “projection” and not an “allocation,” but this is wordplay: The fact remains that the plans were delayed on his watch.

Securing a deal to expedite the bridge’s reconstruction, however, would reverse this mistake and maybe build some positive momentum for the floundering administration.

There are still unanswered questions about just how expedited the process will be. At the meeting where City Council approved the preliminary funding, Department of Mobility and Infrastructure director Kim Lucas would only commit to “before 2027” for a completion date. Since 2027 was when construction was supposed to happen under the original 2022 SPC plan, with bids going out mid-2025, Pittsburghers who use this vital connection are right to want a more specific commitment.

Further, early statements from the city misstated the nature of its own agreement with state and federal agencies, another sign of amateurism in the mayor’s office.

But let’s dwell on the positive: Mr. Gainey’s office effectively advocated for city infrastructure in the labyrinthine state and federal funding process. It’s a success we need to see the mayor repeat many times in the years to come.

Read the full article at post-gazette.com.




McKeesport gets bridge repair funds

McKeesport was recently approved to receive $500,000 in preliminary engineering funds for repairs to the Versailles Avenue bridge. The Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission awarded the funds through its Transportation Improvement Program. The initiative will utilize over $5.6 billion in state, federal and local funds to improve transportation systems over the next four years.

Read the full article at monvalleyindependent.com




WESA-FM: Pittsburgh’s Charles Anderson Bridge to remain closed … but repairs are in the fast lane

Built in 1939, the Charles Anderson Bridge has been slated for an overhaul for years. The city’s 2016 capital budget allocated $750,000 for preliminary engineering work. In the years that followed, projected allocations and timelines for the project changed repeatedly. Money for the project was earmarked in capital budgets over the next three years, with an allocation that grew to $3.3 million by 2019, but that wasn’t spent down.

The city convened public meetings in 2019, but the coronavirus pandemic slowed the work. Even so, in January 2022 the city was able to offer a proposed design for the bridge’s rehabilitation. The $48 million overhaul would preserve the bridge’s historic nature, allow for better passage of large Pittsburgh Regional Transit buses and school buses,while providing wider sidewalks for pedestrians and a separate cycle track for people on bikes.



And the project gained new momentum this winter, when PennDOT and the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission stepped in.

Most infrastructure funding comes from the federal government, which doesn’t just write checks directly to Pittsburgh. Instead, the money must go to a Metropolitan Planning Organization, which the feds task with planning out transportation priorities for urban regions. For Pittsburgh and the surrounding 10-county region, that organization is called the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission, or SPC. For a project to move ahead, it has to be on SPC’s to-do list, which is assembled every year.

“It’s a living document,” said Andy Waple, deputy executive director for SPC’s programs division.

That to-do list, called the Transportation Implementation Plan, gets amended every month by the SPC’s Transportation Technical Committee, a group of planners and engineers who know how to get projects out the door.

At its regular meeting last week, the committee moved the Charles Anderson Bridge up the priority list, and allotted money to it.

Waple said that happened when PennDOT alerted the committee that it could move funds from the state’s Bridge Investment Fund, powered with money from the federal infrastructure bill. He said PennDOT took that step thanks to advocacy from the mayor’s office.

Waple said such allocation changes happen all the time. And in fact, if money isn’t directed to priorities, “We won’t receive as much federal money in the future and … that money can be taken away.”

Read the full article at wesa.com.




Tribune-Review: Pittsburgh’s Strip District attracts ‘melting pot’ of new residents

Rob Brandegee picked up and moved to Pittsburgh’s Strip District to enjoy its convenience and bustling city living atmosphere.

For the growing population of Strip District residents like him, it’s not uncommon to take a walk and run into friends and acquaintances.

“It’s very sociable, and it really has a neighborhood vibe,” said Brandegee.

Brandegee relocated from Highland Park to the Strip in 2021. Part of the appeal was how easy it is to reach South Side-based Little Earth Productions, the company he co-founded that manufactures licensed apparel and accessories, like the Terrible Towel, for professional and college teams. He loves the mix of Strip District residents ranging from young professionals to middle-aged and older.



On Smallman, the iconic Produce Terminal – a string of connected warehouses that opened up a portion of the docks to independent retailers, bakers and craftspeople – has been transformed into The Terminal, a bright, glossy shopping center. Vibrantly painted steps lead to businesses like Aslin Beer Company, Mayweather Boxing & Fitness and Posman’s Books, just a few blocks from long-time fixtures like Salem’s Market & Grill, Robert Wholey & Co. Fish Market and Pennsylvania Macaroni Co.

Several food and entertainment spots within the Terminal are expected to open this spring and summer, including the music venue City Winery, Novo Asian Food Hall, and Puttshack, as well as office space for the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission and the Richard King Mellon Foundation.

Mohamed Yassin likes to visit the Strip District once or twice a week. For the doctor specializing in infectious diseases at nearby UPMC Mercy in Uptown, dropping by the neighborhood is easy.

“I think it’s the heart of Pittsburgh,” the Fox Chapel resident said. “Even just walking around, it makes you feel like part of Pittsburgh. My wife and I will go to Pennsylvania Macaroni Co. to get olives and cheeses. We will stop by the bakery and get some nice bread. Then we take the car up to Mount Washington to see the view. So this place really means a lot to me.”

Dan Adamski, senior managing director of JLL Pittsburgh, noted that commercial construction “is almost completely halted.”

Adamski said the Strip District has a “wow factor” that attracts highly sought-after talent who can live, bike and walk and visit new restaurants and brew pubs.

“That’s what companies in the post-covid world are seeking,” Adamski said. “If you have an office, it can’t be the old, beige cube farm. It’s a confluence of a bunch of attractive factors that, if you’re a company looking for a space, you look at the Strip District.”

Read the full article at triblive.com




WPXI-TV (NBC, Pittsburgh): VIDEO-PART II: Our Region’s Business: Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald

The Airport Area Chamber of Commerce recently recognized the leadership of Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald during an annual State of the County address. Fitzgerald was awarded the “Rich Fitzgerald Distinguished Public Service award. The Chamber recognized Fitzgerald’s pre-pandemic progress revitalizing the airport as a regional economic anchor as well as his stewardship throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic.



Did you know The Allegheny County Executive is the third most powerful elected official in Pennsylvania in terms of the number of citizens represented? Only the Governor and Mayor of Philadelphia represent a larger collection of citizens.

‘Our Region’s Business’ host Bill Flanagan recently sat down with Fitzgerald to reflect on his time as Allegheny County Executive, how far the region has come, and SPC’s role in bringing the region’s counties together.

View the entire interview on wpxi.com.




PennDOT to host Online Public Forum on 12-Year Program (TYP) Update

The 2023 Public Comment Period for the update of the PennDOT 12-Year Program (TYP) is underway and all Pennsylvanians are encouraged to get involved in this important transportation planning effort!

To provide Pennsylvanians with every possible opportunity to get involved and make their voices heard, a Transportation Survey is open for public input.



In addition to the Survey, PennDOT will also host an Online Public Forum on Wednesday, April 12, from 6:30 – 8:00 PM, featuring a presentation from PennDOT leadership and members of the STC, followed by a Q&A session.

Important Dates

Public participation and support ensures a diverse range of comments from across PA and facilitates valuable data for all Transportation Improvement Programs.

Email comments to RA-PennDOTSTC@pa.gov, or call 717-783-2262 to request a printed copy or to complete the survey by telephone.

Visit TalkPATransportation.com to learn more!




Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority Seeking Public Input on Community Engagement Efforts

Feedback is essential to helping the Authority plan for the distribution of federal monies to expand broadband in unserved/underserved areas of PA.

Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority (Authority) Executive Director Brandon Carson is asking Pennsylvanians to provide input on the stakeholder engagement process for developing two plans: the State Digital Equity Plan and the Commonwealth’s Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Five-Year Action Plan.



The public comment period ends Friday, March 10.

After the public comment period closes, the Authority will host two meetings on March 16 to discuss updates to the plan based on feedback received:

  • 11:00AM Meeting in person and virtual attendance:
    Keystone Building, Keystone Desert Room, 400 North Street, Harrisburg, PA, 17120
  • 6:00PM Meeting virtual attendance only

“The Authority understands that different users have different needs, barriers, and preferences for engagement,” said Authority Executive Director Carson. “Feedback on our stakeholder engagement strategy and developing partnerships with communities, organizations, and individuals who are already doing this work is essential to our success.”

The State Digital Equity Stakeholder Engagement Plan will focus on engaging eight primary populations required through federal guidance – aging individuals, incarcerated individuals, veterans, individuals with disabilities, English learners, individuals with low levels of literacy, individuals who are members of an ethnic or racial minority, or individuals living in rural areas – to offer achievable objectives, and measurable outcomes.

  • The plan can be viewed on the Authority’s website and includes:
  • Two digital equity roundtable discussions
  • Community surveys
  • Participation by the Authority in community events
  • In-person community conversations held around the Commonwealth
  • Measurable outcomes

In addition to the plan, the Authority will identify a specific number of stakeholders to form a Digital Equity Stakeholder Engagement Panel to help inform and guide the implementation of the plan.

Too many communities lack access to high-speed internet, and many more cannot afford it or do not know how to use it. This creates a divide between those who have internet access and those who do not. From day one, Governor Shapiro has said extending and expanding access to broadband across the commonwealth and making connection more reliable and affordable is a top priority of the Shapiro Administration. As part of the Digital Equity Act, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration received $2.75 billion to establish three grant programs that promote digital inclusion and equity to ensure that all individuals and communities have the skills, technology, and capacity needed to fully benefit from our digital economy.

The State Digital Equity Planning Grant program, through which the Authority received $1.6 million, will be used to develop a statewide Digital Equity Plan. Stakeholder and community engagement efforts are paramount to the development and ultimate success of the Authority’s planning efforts.

Digital equity is also a core component of the BEAD program and the Authority’s Five-Year Action Plan will incorporate digital equity and inclusion needs, goals, and implementation strategy.

The Authority is charged with creating a statewide broadband plan and distributing federal and state monies for broadband expansion projects in unserved and underserved areas of the Commonwealth.

For more information about the Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority, visit the Authority’s website. For more information about the Department of Community and Economic Development, visit the DCED website, and be sure to stay up-to-date with all of our agency news on Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn.

MEDIA CONTACT: Penny Ickes, DCED, dcedpress@pa.gov




The Tartan: Pittsburgh mayor Ed Gainey hosts CMU town hall

Mayor Ed Gainey met with students on Feb. 23 in an open town hall hosted by CMU Senate and Graduate Student Assembly. Organizers took questions for Mayor Gainey from the students gathered, expressing their comments and concerns for the city.



Gainey assumed the mayoralty in January 2022, beating out the Democratic incumbent in the primaries and defeating the Republican candidate with 71 percent of the popular vote. He is the first Black person to be voted into the position. His administration has centered its efforts on promoting economic and social justice, and building a city with equity and inclusivity for all.

Below are edited selections from last week’s hour-long conversation: students’ questions, and Mayor Gainey’s remarks.

What are your top priorities as Mayor, especially as it relates to students here at Carnegie Mellon?

I want this to be the safest, most welcoming, and thriving city in America. Now, I didn’t say it because I thought it was going to be easy. We’re coming out of a pandemic, which has changed the course of our lives and had an impact on everybody. More struggling with mental health, more unhoused, more drug usage, more violence. But I tell people I want to make this the safest city because I believe we can. I’ve had to deal with a lot in trying to make that a reality.

In my first 48 hours after I got elected, we had our first snowstorm, and found out we had no money in the Department of Public Works, our trucks were 10 to 15 years old, and we had 21 percent personnel not at work. But I wanted to let the workers know that I was with them. So, I jumped in the snow truck, and I went out with them. Because I wanted them to know that I don’t lead from the back, I lead from the front. I believe that a boss will tell you what to do but won’t go with you. A leader will go first and ask permission for you to follow. And I think that’s the difference when we talk about leadership styles.

I grew up in a city that was siloed and segregated. I don’t want that society. We have to celebrate culture, that’s the American way. Because I have the most diverse staff that was ever in the mayor’s office – the most diverse administration ever, and it means we can thrive. At the end of the day, if you’re not diverse, you’re not prepared.

Do you know if the massive chemical spill in East Palestine will at all affect the residents of Pittsburgh, whether the water or the air?

We’re not sure yet. We’re trying to gather mayors from all around southwest Pennsylvania to talk about it. I think this is an opportunity for us to really deal with Norfolk Southern, which has been a thorn in all of our sides for a long time. They barely take responsibility for anything if you want to be honest. I’m not sure what five to six months looks like. What I can tell you now, is that state officials say that it doesn’t. That’s all I know.

You mentioned that you want to create Pittsburgh as a city for all. How would you fit education into that?

I think education is very important. And so that’s why I made it a focal point of mine to create a relationship with Pittsburgh Public Schools, because the last administration and the last superintendent did not have a relationship. To improve the quality of education from a city perspective, for one we created a youth Civic Leadership Academy, alongside PPS, Partner4Work, and the Community College of Allegheny County, so high school kids can get paid a stipend while learning and earning college credits.

Growing up I never knew who the mayor was. They never came to my neighborhood. What I want kids to know and understand is the function of not only the mayor but civic government. We’re also creating a Youth Ambassador Program to connect kids with higher learning and give them a voice to talk about what the world looks like to them.

You mentioned Carnegie Mellon as a potential partner in your last answer. I’m wondering more generally what your administration is looking for Carnegie Mellon or Pitt to do, if they can do more for the city of Pittsburgh?

We want to make sure that our infrastructure is good. Our nonprofits own a lot of infrastructure in this city. And we can’t grow if we’re not together. We can’t grow if we’re not working to make the city the best place it can be. If our roads, public safety, parks, ecosystem are not good, it’s not good for your university. What we’re asking for is cooperation. It’s only together can we make this the best city that we want it to be.

If people don’t see their culture reflected in our city, they’re not staying. We have a lot of college kids that come in and go to college, but they don’t stay. We have a lot of businesspeople who come in and get educated. And they leave because they don’t see their culture reflected from our city. We have to change that. Well, that doesn’t just come from the city government. We all must play our part.

There’s a saying that first impressions last. Pittsburgh International Airport is the first image many students see when arriving in the city. What is the current plan for expansion of the airport and the timeline for the new terminal?

I’ll share something with you. The city doesn’t control the airport. That’s a county function. I don’t even have a seat on the Airport Authority Board. The city has no jurisdiction over the airport authority at all. I don’t know all the plans because we’re not at the table. The city doesn’t control what used to be called Port Authority, or Health and Human Services. It’s all controlled by the county.

Now, let me tell you what I’d like to see. I think that in order for a city to be successful, you have to have a world-class airport. But if we build a world-class airport without transportation, getting people from the airport to Oakland, without sitting in traffic for an hour and a half … then what good is a world-class airport, if it doesn’t transport people? If we don’t find a way to transport people better, then we’ll just have a world-class airport with status-quo transportation.

That’s a good question because a lot of people think the city controls all that. But we don’t.

As a student, I walk around a lot and sidewalks are important to me. Some sidewalks will be unsalted for long periods of time and get incredibly icy. In some areas, sidewalks are broken or completely absent. Is there a plan to improve them?

Here’s the tricky part, right? The city doesn’t own all the sidewalks, some of it is privately owned because they’re attached to a house. We can’t go on private property and salt or fix that sidewalk. The ones that we own, we’re doing, starting in Arlington and Homewood with a program connecting Safe Routes to School, the two areas with the most kids walking to school.

The program that we will expand on offers to pay private homeowners a certain percentage of the cost to fix the sidewalk, who may not have the money themselves. We haven’t done this yet; we’re tinkering with it to make sure it’s correct. If private owners are willing to do that, then that will give us permission to go on their sidewalk and fix it. But because we have not invested in our sandbox in a long time, we’re lightyears behind, to be honest. It’ll take some years to catch up.

A lot of Carnegie Mellon students who don’t live on campus live in South Oakland and many of the landlords there are notoriously terrible. Do you have any plans to crack down on “slumlords” operating across Pittsburgh?

So let me be honest, that was not on our list, with everything going on in the city. That’s a great question that I have to take back. We did the rental registry, which was supposed to address that right there, that if you don’t have quality housing, it’s problematic, and the city will act. We’re in court with that right now. But that was our answer to, not only in South Oakland, but throughout the city, make landlords responsible. I agree, in many areas, it’s been a problem. We will continue to fight it. But they will fight back, that’s what makes it challenging. When we get the rental registry complete, it won’t be immediately -there’s no microwave meals in change. But you will definitely see a difference.

Bridges are very important to Pittsburgh. You have a seat on the Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission , which helps with getting state and federal funds to projects like renovating our bridges in Pittsburgh, essential for revitalizing our infrastructure. From my understanding, in the past several months, you have not been at some of those meetings. There hasn’t been a representative from your office at those meetings.

We send a representative every month. The article was about me not being there. I can’t be at every meeting, but I have a Director of Economic Development who is at every meeting. We took the SPC to Harrisburg last year, lobbying for our fair share, because Philadelphia was getting more than theirs. And we’ll be back again. The article that you’re referencing was about, to be frank, the fact that I support the workers striking against the Post-Gazette. And I won’t waver on it. If you want to put it out there that I don’t attend the SPC meetings, I can’t say you’re incorrect. But it’s not the truth. My office is there every month.

I believe in people’s right to unionize. And I believe that in today’s times, with corporations and everybody else making billions of dollars, that there’s a right to be able to pay your workers. You can’t keep asking for more and say that your pay is status quo. Status-quo doesn’t grow. We’ve always been a union town. And I think that you see more people starting to stand up and fight for their rights, and I’m for that.

In life, you have to learn how to fall in love with adversity, stay away from controversy. Because adversity will build you. I have nothing but respect for the Post-Gazette. They can say what they want. The reality is my team was there and we will continue to be there. What they didn’t say is we must have done something right. They built the bridge quicker than it’s ever been built before.

For the long-term residents of Pittsburgh, do you think there’s an issue with increased rents? And if so, how would you address that? Also, do you think it’s important to improve the homeownership rates in the city?

Yes, and yes. Inclusionary zoning allows us to embed inside a project a certain amount of affordability so we can keep the development stable. I believe that to break the chains of poverty, you have to have affordable housing units, to show children something new than what they’re used to seeing every single day. I believe that we have to increase the rate of homeownership. We’re looking for immediate funding to help us begin our expansion of affordable units.

We’ve already sent a message to the development community that if you don’t have affordability in your housing, we don’t do business. Thanks to negotiations with developers, namely Oakland Crossings [a new development plan] close to here, we were able to ensure deep affordability with Section Eight vouchers to get more of a diverse audience in that housing complex.

Those are the things we’re doing to move this housing market forward. It’s not that I’m against market rate, but market rate doesn’t grow cities. We’ve lost population as the market rate has grown. We’re a second-class city, we’re only 301,000. If we lose too much population, we’ll drop to a third-class city [classification], which would hurt us from a funding standpoint of federal and state money. And we can’t afford that.

Pittsburgh is known for being quite gentrified. What are your thoughts on how gentrification is impacting the city, and what is being done about it?

I’ve seen it firsthand. We lost 7,000 people to gentrification, out of the city. It’s unhealthy, it hurts the school district and the whole ecosystem. I came in laser-focused, and I’ve told developers that if you don’t have affordability in your housing project, don’t come see me. We have to stabilize our communities, our neighborhoods. A lot of the people that were gentrified went out to areas where they have poor transportation, creating islands of poverty, instead of empowerment centers, what housing can be.

You know, out of 15 major metropolitan cities, Pittsburgh’s the only city that doesn’t have a Black, Latino, or Asian middle-class neighborhood. That’s amazing in 2023. But it gives us the ability to advocate for affordability. Because to grow, you have to have affordability. And we will continue to do that until we stabilize the city.

From what you’ve said today, it seems “diversity” is the key word. You want people coming here to stay, not just for school. As mayor, how do you see your administration making Pittsburgh more attractive, competing with bigger cities in the area?

It’s our history. We’ve always been a connector between the Midwest and the East Coast. Most cities can’t say that. Technology has grown here, for a reason. We’re close to big cities, New York, Chicago, but don’t have the high real estate those areas have. Our parks are beautiful, and our top-tier universities make us attractive. We’re beginning to see diversity in our business climate. We’re seeing more enthusiastic youth who just want to see their culture embraced here. For me, as mayor, I see more of an upside to that challenge than a downside.

But what I tell young people is, what this city will look like in 20 years, you know better than me. Your eyes will dictate what this city is really going to be. My generation has to execute the plan to build for a better tomorrow for the youth to advance the way they see fit.

In here, all of you are future leaders, whether you believe it or not, because when I was in your seat, I didn’t believe it. But I get it now. Your eyes are deeper than mine. You see what you want the world to be. I got to execute the plan that I saw twenty years ago when I was in your seat. When I’m ready to pass that baton, 15 years from now, you should be ready to lead.

View the full article at thetartan.org




NEXTransit Announces Public Engagement

Your Downtown bus route may be changing!

PRT has prepared two scenarios that reconsider bus routes within Downtown Pittsburgh and we want to know what you think! Join an upcoming online meeting, visit us at our pop-up storefront downtown, or give feedback online.



Tuesday, 2/28: Register online or join by phone (dial 646-931-3860, meeting code 814 1715 0379)
Wednesday, 3/1: Register online or join by phone (dial 309-205-3325, meeting code 899 0937 5044)

Visit us at our Downtown pop-up storefront at 625 Smithfield Street (right next to the PRT Service Station)

  • Monday, February 27th from 2pm-5pm
  • Tuesday, February 28th from 12pm-4pm
  • Wednesday, March 1st from 7am-11am
  • Thursday, March 2nd from 3pm-7pm
  • Friday, March 3rd from 8am-2pm
  • Saturday, March 4th from 10am-2pm

Visit us online at nextransit.network/downtown




Cranberry summit provides update on broadband efforts

“The lack of access to high-speed broadband is a genuine problem in many communities throughout our region,” Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission Vice Chairman and Armstrong County Commissioner Pat Fabian during a Regional Broadband & Connectivity Summit Thursday in Butler County.

SPC is a municipal planning organization representing Pittsburgh and the 10 counties surrounding the city, which seeks to work as one on the goals of transportation, planning and development, and information systems in the southwestern corner of the state.



“Without this, our region’s businesses, households and public institutions cannot prosper,” Fabian said to an audience gathered in Cranberry Township. “At SPC, we believe that by working together with private and public partners and across local, regional, state and federal levels, we can lead the effort to make our vision of affordable, equitable broadband access a reality in every part of southwestern Pennsylvania.”

During the summit, it was reported that most of the 10-county region are either underserved, with download speeds of less than 50 megabits per second (Mbps), or unserved, with download speeds of less than 25 Mbps.

SPC said download speeds between 50 and 99 Mbps are more common in Allegheny and Butler counties, but are found only in small areas throughout the remaining eight counties, including Armstrong and Indiana.

A series of panel discussions took up much of the day, including one regarding the “Pennsylvania Statewide Implementation Plan” and a summary of regional efforts, with Indiana County Office of Planning & Development Executive Director Byron G. Stauffer Jr. as the moderator.

Stauffer has been at the forefront of efforts to expand broadband in Indiana County, with one $2.3 million contract awarded so far and more to be brought soon to the county commissioners. The ICOPD director said the next phase of what eventually will be a $7 million network of broadband connections could be announced as soon as the next meeting of the county board on Wednesday.

Stauffer was joined by two representatives of state agencies, Brandon Carson, executive director of the Department of Community and Economic Development’s Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority, and Dr. Kyle Kopko, executive director of the General Assembly’s Center for Rural Pennsylvania.

Kopko said there are 19 counties regarded as urban, 48 as rural, with some rural areas in every county except Philadelphia and Delaware counties.

He said there has been stagnation in rural communities in Pennsylvania, with the population in those communities rising from 3.39 million to 2000 to 3.47 million in 2010, then dropping back to 3.38 million in 2020.

Read the full article at IndianaGazette.com